"Making It Easier for Tyrants to Rule", Fayyaz Condemns Government’s Constitutional Plot

Former Chairperson of the Maldivian Democratic Party (MDP) and former Minister of Economic Development Fayyaz Ismail has strongly criticised the government’s proposed constitutional amendment, warning that the move is aimed at securing re-election for an increasingly unpopular administration rather than strengthening democracy or reducing election costs.

In a statement shared on X, Fayyaz said the amendment, which allows presidential and parliamentary elections to be held together represents a deliberate attempt to consolidate political power.

“The amendment is not meant to strengthen the system nor to reduce cost. It is a means to consolidate the chances of re-election for a deeply unpopular incumbent government,” Fayyaz said.

While acknowledging that the current political system has failed to fully meet the aspirations of the democratic movement or adequately protect citizens from authoritarian leadership, Fayyaz warned that the proposed changes would only make it easier for future tyrants to remain in power.

“What we need are stronger means by which the people can hold the government and entire State accountable, not piecemeal changes designed to entrench the powers of the ruling party,” the statement added.

Fayyaz called for comprehensive democratic reforms, including curbing presidential powers, strengthening judicial independence, safeguarding independent institutions, and introducing mechanisms that allow citizens to directly hold elected leaders accountable.

“The Maldivian people must reject the fraudulent amendment proposed by the government, and instead seek real reform that transfers power closer to the people,” the statement said, urging citizens to look beyond party politics and recognise the urgency of the current situation.

The remarks come as Parliament fast-tracked and passed the government-backed constitutional amendment, triggering criticism from opposition figures and civil society groups over the speed of the process and the lack of broad public consultation.